Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

S54 Dyno Database

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ///Mangler
    replied
    Originally posted by stash1 View Post

    Hey Anri, I'm not 100% sure that they're actually even advertised as equal length or not-lol But yeah, as we all know now, it's a compromised design. Poor low-end performance w/some pretty good top-end w/the right tuning.😉
    Here is a quote and plot from my tuner. The loss of torque can be almost completely mitigated with a proper tune on a stand alone EMS.

    "Make sure you have a pretty much open 3.5” exhaust, otherwise will lose huge power.

    Here is a SSV1 complete, swapped over to the AR header (only change). Both tuned on same dyno, both by us, both on Emtron. Note – SAE number too."

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Unknown.png
Views:	1189
Size:	501.3 KB
ID:	166714

    Leave a comment:


  • DoubleSidedTape
    replied
    288/280 cams, Megan headers, everything else stock. Tuned by HTE.

    Leave a comment:


  • stash1
    replied
    Originally posted by Anri View Post

    Stan,

    I have not seen the ARH in person to compare the length
    of the tubes to other brand headers. The longer the better.
    From pictures looks like they are equal length and that is
    a good thing.

    ARH did something a bit wrong and reason for 5k rpm
    and up of operation.

    Regards,
    Anri.
    Hey Anri, I'm not 100% sure that they're actually even advertised as equal length or not-lol But yeah, as we all know now, it's a compromised design. Poor low-end performance w/some pretty good top-end w/the right tuning.😉

    Leave a comment:


  • Anri
    replied
    Originally posted by stash1 View Post
    Not sure if this has been posted in here, but here’s a recent dyno test of the ARH header system by Buildjournal:

    https://thebuildjournal.com/reviews/...ts-and-review/

    The data looks pretty consistent w/my own personal experience as well.
    Stan,

    I have not seen the ARH in person to compare the length
    of the tubes to other brand headers. The longer the better.
    From pictures looks like they are equal length and that is
    a good thing.

    ARH did something a bit wrong and reason for 5k rpm
    and up of operation.

    Regards,
    Anri.

    Leave a comment:


  • fourmula1
    replied
    342hp on a dynojet
    2003.5 dedicated track car ~93k miles...a lot of them on the track.
    karb csl intake, catless headers, oem section 1 & 2, old agency power section 3
    suspected fuel pressure issue...

    If anyone has recommendations for troubleshooting fuel pressure issues in order of most likely culprits to least likely that would be helpful. Fuel filter under the car was just replaced. I'll replace the fuel pressure regulator next. Fuel pump after that?
    Last edited by fourmula1; 04-13-2022, 09:05 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • stash1
    replied
    Not sure if this has been posted in here, but here’s a recent dyno test of the ARH header system by Buildjournal:

    https://thebuildjournal.com/reviews/...ts-and-review/

    The data looks pretty consistent w/my own personal experience as well.
    Last edited by stash1; 04-12-2022, 05:18 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nick_P
    replied
    Originally posted by repoman89 View Post

    Stock cams?
    Yes, stock cams. No other engine mods

    Leave a comment:


  • repoman89
    replied
    Originally posted by Nick_P View Post
    Evolve CSL airbox and full SS exhaust with cats, made ~331whp/ 247 torque…not bad. Did a run at ~338whp but decided to dial it down a bit for safety. This was on dynojet with AlphaN tune from Epic.
    Stock cams?

    Leave a comment:


  • Nick_P
    replied
    Evolve CSL airbox and full SS exhaust with cats, made ~331whp/ 247 torque…not bad. Did a run at ~338whp but decided to dial it down a bit for safety. This was on dynojet with AlphaN tune from Epic.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • jet_dogg
    replied
    Looks down on power for the mods.

    Leave a comment:


  • stash1
    replied
    Originally posted by digger View Post
    Looks too lean upto 6/6.5k if the o2 is to be trusted
    Ya, you never know how accurate any of these guy’s snifers really are at the end of tha day!? All you can do is tune for optimum power, run quality fuel, and then try and manage the heat in the motor whether it be on the street or on the track., and then hope that the actual AFR's are within safe limits.
    Last edited by stash1; 03-15-2022, 07:43 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • eXpensiveGears
    replied
    Originally posted by sc_tr0jan_m3 View Post
    Had to redyno for the nasa season ahead. No major changes from before but karb cal and SS headers and BW exhaust.

    326 whp is fun when the car weighs 2900 with me in it!




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    2900 lbs!? Please share the car diet...

    Leave a comment:


  • digger
    replied
    Looks too lean upto 6/6.5k if the o2 is to be trusted

    Leave a comment:


  • sc_tr0jan_m3
    replied
    Had to redyno for the nasa season ahead. No major changes from before but karb cal and SS headers and BW exhaust.

    326 whp is fun when the car weighs 2900 with me in it!




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • LSBNick
    replied
    Originally posted by HanSooloo View Post

    Really impressive numbers. What camshafts are you running?
    I got similar numbers on my SS and Karbonius setup and everyone said I should be making closer to 330-340whp But this seems to be more in line with recent dyno sheets I’ve seen.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X