Yes, cleaned by the guy here who did it years ago.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
S54 Dyno Database
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
Thanks for the insight!
I had your canned tune for awhile and worked flawlessly for years! Very happy with it! Dyno’d at 325whp with it.
I switched because I needed a detune for a NASA class.
Originally posted by Darbshaw View Post
This is promising, almost identical to my current build. BW race is the sections 1,2,3 correct? My only difference would be having the street/track which has a stock section 1. I'm curious where I'll fall and if I have that same low rpm dip.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
i am suprised nobody as brought something similar to market as a bit less of a compromise and the 6-2-1 is the superior power setup over 6-2-H/X-2 with other advantages to boot
Comment
-
Originally posted by digger View Post
to boost 2.5-4k you could experiment with exactly doubling (or close to it) the current merge distance (which would still be slightly shorter/less than the stock merge distance by looks of it) but it will likely soften 4-5k a bit as a compromise but shouldnt hurt anyting above 5k. its expensive doing custom exhausts and hard to undo , so it depends how much it bothers you for the type of use
i am suprised nobody as brought something similar to market as a bit less of a compromise and the 6-2-1 is the superior power setup over 6-2-H/X-2 with other advantages to boot
The BW race is all about weight savings and top end power. I think if you move the merge back it will add unnecessary weight for those who would buy this. You certainly wouldn't put a BW race on for the sound.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
I am not worried about that region - track only. I might touch upper 3k a few times but usually it will be on purpose where I stay in a higher gear to deaden the torque because of a bump or tricky corner.
The BW race is all about weight savings and top end power. I think if you move the merge back it will add unnecessary weight for those who would buy this. You certainly wouldn't put a BW race on for the sound.
Comment
-
Originally posted by digger View Post
it will replace 2-3 feet of single 3.5" with 2-3 feet of dual 2.375" (or whatever it is) which will be maybe 2-3lb so doesnt sifnificantly affect the core weight saving benefit (claimed 62) as the saving is not from piping sizes but lack of cats and lack of big resonator / big muffler but i do know people would be avoiding because of the torque dip
Comment
Comment