Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

S54 Dyno Database

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Yes, cleaned by the guy here who did it years ago.

    Comment


      Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
      Epic Alpha-N dyno tune
      Megan headers
      3.5" BW race
      Crappy Injen Intake
      JB Racing Flywheel

      337whp/267yq

      That is about 12 more hp! Randy fixed the dip between 4.5k to 5.5k and it feels a lot better from 3.5k to 5.5k.

      The dip between 2.5k to 4k...because of the BW race?

      Click image for larger version

Name:	Dyno.png
Views:	195
Size:	46.3 KB
ID:	301080
      This is promising, almost identical to my current build. BW race is the sections 1,2,3 correct? My only difference would be having the street/track which has a stock section 1. I'm curious where I'll fall and if I have that same low rpm dip.

      Comment


        Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post

        Thanks for the insight!

        I had your canned tune for awhile and worked flawlessly for years! Very happy with it! Dyno’d at 325whp with it.

        I switched because I needed a detune for a NASA class.
        Great to hear! Certainly a healthy motor, especially with the stock camshafts.​


        Originally posted by Darbshaw View Post

        This is promising, almost identical to my current build. BW race is the sections 1,2,3 correct? My only difference would be having the street/track which has a stock section 1. I'm curious where I'll fall and if I have that same low rpm dip.
        You won't have any dip with the Street/Track version that maintains section 1. Potentially, the full race version might have a touch more top end power 🙂

        Comment


          Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
          .

          The dip between 2.5k to 4k...because of the BW race?

          Click image for larger version  Name:	Dyno.png Views:	140 Size:	46.3 KB ID:	301080
          to boost 2.5-4k you could experiment with exactly doubling (or close to it) the current merge distance (which would still be slightly shorter/less than the stock merge distance by looks of it) but it will likely soften 4-5k a bit as a compromise but shouldnt hurt anyting above 5k. its expensive doing custom exhausts and hard to undo , so it depends how much it bothers you for the type of use

          i am suprised nobody as brought something similar to market as a bit less of a compromise and the 6-2-1 is the superior power setup over 6-2-H/X-2 with other advantages to boot

          Comment


            Originally posted by digger View Post

            to boost 2.5-4k you could experiment with exactly doubling (or close to it) the current merge distance (which would still be slightly shorter/less than the stock merge distance by looks of it) but it will likely soften 4-5k a bit as a compromise but shouldnt hurt anyting above 5k. its expensive doing custom exhausts and hard to undo , so it depends how much it bothers you for the type of use

            i am suprised nobody as brought something similar to market as a bit less of a compromise and the 6-2-1 is the superior power setup over 6-2-H/X-2 with other advantages to boot
            I am not worried about that region - track only. I might touch upper 3k a few times but usually it will be on purpose where I stay in a higher gear to deaden the torque because of a bump or tricky corner.

            The BW race is all about weight savings and top end power. I think if you move the merge back it will add unnecessary weight for those who would buy this. You certainly wouldn't put a BW race on for the sound.

            Comment


              Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post

              I am not worried about that region - track only. I might touch upper 3k a few times but usually it will be on purpose where I stay in a higher gear to deaden the torque because of a bump or tricky corner.

              The BW race is all about weight savings and top end power. I think if you move the merge back it will add unnecessary weight for those who would buy this. You certainly wouldn't put a BW race on for the sound.
              it will replace 2-3 feet of single 3.5" with 2-3 feet of dual 2.375" (or whatever it is) which will be maybe 2-3lb so doesnt sifnificantly affect the core weight saving benefit (claimed 62) as the saving is not from piping sizes but lack of cats and lack of big resonator / big muffler but i do know people would be avoiding because of the torque dip

              Comment


                Originally posted by digger View Post

                it will replace 2-3 feet of single 3.5" with 2-3 feet of dual 2.375" (or whatever it is) which will be maybe 2-3lb so doesnt sifnificantly affect the core weight saving benefit (claimed 62) as the saving is not from piping sizes but lack of cats and lack of big resonator / big muffler but i do know people would be avoiding because of the torque dip
                Yeah but 2-3lbs makes a difference in the big picture. A lb here, a lb there…it all ads up.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post

                  Yeah but 2-3lbs makes a difference in the big picture. A lb here, a lb there…it all ads up.
                  1 part in a 1000 lol

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X