I received a radiator for my M6 yesterday from FCP and it is damaged with visible damage to the packaging.
I started a return process and see that I am responsible for return shipping, I've already sent an email but something seems wrong here.
I understand paying for shipping on a lifetime part guarantee but not this. I also remember them paying for return shipping when I received a damaged M3 radiator a year or so ago.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dumb Question Thread - No Flaming Allowed
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Avedis View PostFollowing up on this, both came out. It is either incredibly difficult or really easy depending on how much or little windshield sealant squished out into the channel before they were installed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Slideways View PostIf they are anything like the E60 M5, they should be removable and replaceable with the windshields in place. They usually have a metal U shaped frame built into the seal that clips into the glass. It can sometimes take a lot of effort to get the gasket removal started. Best to tape off the area to keep the paint from getting damaged.
Originally posted by PSUEng View PostI currently have my car into a pro detailer to remove a very old clear bra/ppf. He got it off no problem, but should I re-apply PPF? My DDs have it, as I'm on the highway and our shit roads have many surprises. The car looks great without PPF IMO, curious what others think.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
I currently have my car into a pro detailer to remove a very old clear bra/ppf. He got it off no problem, but should I re-apply PPF? My DDs have it, as I'm on the highway and our shit roads have many surprises. The car looks great without PPF IMO, curious what others think.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PSUEng View PostMy turn for today: Years ago I went with the replacement so-called (as I recall, anyway) "aero" wiper blades and I think I tossed my original blades. Can I still buy those and the appropriate rubber inserts? I think I want to go back to original after driving in the rain today and watching these "aero" blades dance all over the place.
While FCP no longer carries the Bosch inserts, one or two other venders might still have them.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Avedis View PostIs it possible to remove/replace the front and rear windshield rubber trim (gasket) without pulling the glass? I just gave it a look and damn those things are stiff and deep under the glass.
Leave a comment:
-
Is it possible to remove/replace the front and rear windshield rubber trim (gasket) without pulling the glass? I just gave it a look and damn those things are stiff and deep under the glass.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
My turn for today: Years ago I went with the replacement so-called (as I recall, anyway) "aero" wiper blades and I think I tossed my original blades. Can I still buy those and the appropriate rubber inserts? I think I want to go back to original after driving in the rain today and watching these "aero" blades dance all over the place.
Leave a comment:
-
I have a dumb question. We never had halogens headlights on Canadian E46 M3 and I was wondering if halogens had leveling switches on front and rear control arms too??
I don't think they have it but just want to confirm
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BigRussia View Post
Haha yup, I’m not too worried since I figure yeah maybe it’s the Redline oil. Now if on the next report being back on LM trends like this I’d really start worrying/planning for RB service.
Yup exact same use on the LiquiMoly GT1 10W-60, I was doing the same amount of track days on the previous LM fills/oa reports; they're the 2023 and 2022 reports on there (even having more mileage on the 2023 fill). Only reason I switched away from LM was cause of reading Bimmerworld’s tech articles and them recommending the RL 15w50 for S54’s that see some track time :/
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by IamFODI View PostI personally wouldn't go changing rod bearings immediately based on this, but I sure as hell would have done what you did, i.e. go back to the oil that was producing good reports. This may have been a case of fixing what ain't broke.
Was your usage similar on LM 10W-60, though?
Yup exact same use on the LiquiMoly GT1 10W-60, I was doing the same amount of track days on the previous LM fills/oa reports; they're the 2023 and 2022 reports on there (even having more mileage on the 2023 fill). Only reason I switched away from LM was cause of reading Bimmerworld’s tech articles and them recommending the RL 15w50 for S54’s that see some track time :/
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BigRussia View PostDo we still have a running/active Blackstone Oil Analysis thread? I tried looking for it as didn't want to create yet another oil thread lol.
I just got my report back and both tin and lead are higher now after running Redline 15w50 for two fills with mostly track and HPDE useSo now wondering if its already time again for another rod bearing job.. they were changed with OEM ~16k miles ago. Last report (first fill of trying RL 15w50) BS noted Tin was higher, while all my previous reports w LM 10w60 were glowing and engine was wearing good according to them. Im now currently back on LM 10w60.
Was your usage similar on LM 10W-60, though?
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Do we still have a running/active Blackstone Oil Analysis thread? I tried looking for it as didn't want to create yet another oil thread lol.
I just got my report back and both tin and lead are higher now after running Redline 15w50 for two fills with mostly track and HPDE useSo now wondering if its already time again for another rod bearing job.. they were changed with OEM ~16k miles ago. Last report (first fill of trying RL 15w50) BS noted Tin was higher, while all my previous reports w LM 10w60 were glowing and engine was wearing good according to them. Im now currently back on LM 10w60.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: