Originally posted by Bry5on
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Black & Tan 332iT
Collapse
X
-
2002 Topasblau M3 - Coupe - 6MT - Karbonius CSL Airbox - MSS54HP Conversion - SSV1 - HJS - Mullet Tune - MK60 Swap - ZCP Rack - Nogaros - AutoSolutions - 996 Brembos - Slon - CMP - VinceBar - Koni - Eibach - BlueBus - Journal
2012 Alpinweiss 128i - Coupe - 6AT - Slicktop - Manual Seats - Daily - Journal
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Thanks to YoitsTmac and heinzboehmer we've got an interesting finding. I've overlaid a non-m knuckle scan to an M3 knuckle scan, and the numbers do not match the BMW quoted steering ratios.
So here's what I've got for LCA to tie rod distance:
M3: 130mm
Non-m: 126mm
SuperKnuck: 122.9mm
That means that if M3 CSL/ZCP is 14.5:1, then
Non-M: 14.05:1
SuperKnuck: 13.7:1
And consequently, if the non-M is 13.7:1, then
M3 CSL/ZCP: 14.13:1
SuperKnuck: 13.36:1
Now I'm going to have to pull up the numbers in NCS expert to see what the DSC module says. Guess that knuckle I ordered is a bit of a tighter steering ratio than planned!
Blue is M3, brown is non-m:
Last edited by Bry5on; Yesterday, 11:22 PM.‘02 332iT / 6 | ‘70 Jaguar XJ6 electric conversion
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Huh, that's surprising. Static camber and caster (and toe?) look different too?
I would trust the geometry of the pickup points for the LCA, tie rod, strut and caliper brackets in the scan. Not sure I'd trust the relation between the hub and the aforementioned features, though. The heat shield was hard to wrap the scan around.
What happens if you line the scans up on the LCA/caliper bracket mounting points? I would think those are the same between the M and non-M knuckles. Almost looks like the non-M tie rod pickup point would end up higher than the M one, resulting in a slight change in effective LCA to tie rod distance.2002 Topasblau M3 - Coupe - 6MT - Karbonius CSL Airbox - MSS54HP Conversion - SSV1 - HJS - Mullet Tune - MK60 Swap - ZCP Rack - Nogaros - AutoSolutions - 996 Brembos - Slon - CMP - VinceBar - Koni - Eibach - BlueBus - Journal
2012 Alpinweiss 128i - Coupe - 6AT - Slicktop - Manual Seats - Daily - Journal
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I lined them up on the mounting bosses for the heat shield as I believe that’s a shared part number. Lots of geometry tweaks, ones I’ve noted (M3):
- Caster (increase)
- Trail (increase)
- Inner tire clearance (slight increase from moving strut inboard)
- Ackerman (decrease)
- Scrub (increase)
- Bump steer (hard to say direction, but probably decrease)
- Caliper clocking, radial- and back-spacing‘02 332iT / 6 | ‘70 Jaguar XJ6 electric conversion
Comment
-
Oh, clever!
Kinda blown away by the findings. They're far more different than I though they were.2002 Topasblau M3 - Coupe - 6MT - Karbonius CSL Airbox - MSS54HP Conversion - SSV1 - HJS - Mullet Tune - MK60 Swap - ZCP Rack - Nogaros - AutoSolutions - 996 Brembos - Slon - CMP - VinceBar - Koni - Eibach - BlueBus - Journal
2012 Alpinweiss 128i - Coupe - 6AT - Slicktop - Manual Seats - Daily - Journal
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by heinzboehmer View PostOh, clever!
Kinda blown away by the findings. They're far more different than I though they were.
First principles has the on center steering ratio at 16.33:1 for an M3 CSL/ZCP and 15.4:1 for my knuckle. Recall that the 992 ST is 15:1 in center, but 13.5:1 after accounting for wheelbase differences. So even with the ratio shorter than the non-m, we’re still a ways off the sports car.‘02 332iT / 6 | ‘70 Jaguar XJ6 electric conversion
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment